On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:16 -0700, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> I confirm that scan_freq is accepted by the current wpa_supplicant but
> has no reliable effect.  Both ath5k and ath9k connected to an AP on the
> channel 6 when "scan_freq=2412" was in the configuration file.

scan_freq is not supposed to limit the association to specific channels;
it is only to limit scan requests made by wpa_supplicant. You may still
find BSSes on other channels either due to scan requests made by other
programs or by receiving Beacon/Probe Response frames on another
channel.

If there is interest for limiting the association to specific channels,
it should be trivial addition to wpa_supplicant (with nl80211). I don't
know whether I would fully agree on this being a useful thing for
general use, but I can understand it at least as a testing tool (which
people may then misuse for other things ;-).

- Jouni


_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to