Hello Mr.Adrian,
Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the following
2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules.
http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note
According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and
BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE. What is
your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros
chipsets.
Regards
Sandeep.
________________________________
From: Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org>
To: sandeep suresh <sandeep.sur...@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <suj...@msujith.org>; ath9k-devel
<ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>; "linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior
Hi,
Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity.
So if it were working, that would stay low.
adrian
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
