On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 20:14 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Ah, so, that's why it's showing up now. We probably have had the same > issue all along but it used to be masked by the softirq limiting. Do > you care to revive the 10 iterations limit so that it's limited by > both the count and timing? We do wanna find out why softirq is > spinning indefinitely tho.
Yes, no problem, I can do that. _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
