> On 2014-07-13 12:18, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: >> Disable ack timeout estimation algorithm if the coverage class has been >> configured >> >> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.biancon...@gmail.com> > I think this is broken, since it doesn't allow you to re-enable dynack > through the same way as it was disabled. > I would recommend adding an 'auto' value for coverage class.
Ok. Could we use 255 as 'auto' value? Did you mean something else? According to the standard maximum value for coverage class is 31, isn't it? > > - Felix Best regards, Lorenzo -- UNIX is Sexy: who | grep -i blonde | talk; cd ~; wine; talk; touch; unzip; touch; strip; gasp; finger; gasp; mount; fsck; more; yes; gasp; umount; make clean; sleep _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
