I don't think the hardware supports immediate-BA. :(
-a On 23 October 2014 07:32, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nis...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is a part of 802.11n because of compatibility with 802.11e. But because > 802.11n gives a much more advanced AMPDU based thing I think no one > implemented it. It not a mandatory part of WMM I suppose. > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Kamran Nishat <kamran.nis...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I was talking about the same one. it was introduced in 802.11e (Tx-OP) not >> in 802.11n >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ali Abedi <a2ab...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Adrian and Kamran, >>> >>> Thanks for your replies. I think we are not referring to the same >>> concept. >>> Can you please have a look at the attache diagram. I need the middle one >>> the immediate BA not delayed BA. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ali >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 14-10-22 11:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't think mac80211 supports delayed-BA. :( >>>> >>>> >>>> -adrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 22 October 2014 08:38, Ali Abedi <a2ab...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I am interested to know if we can send multiple packets >>>>> (non-aggregated, >>>>> single packets) and then ask >>>>> for a block ACK? I like to know if this functionality has been >>>>> implemented in ath9k or if >>>>> it is possible to achieve this with slight code modifications. >>>>> >>>>> What I need: >>>>> Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-Frame-SIFS-REQ Block ACK-SIFS-Block ACK >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Ali >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ath9k-devel mailing list >>>>> ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org >>>>> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel >>> >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel > _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
