On Fri, Nov 27 2015, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 22:10 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: >> >> Because in [1] Jouni said that >> >> "kernel config option + custom regdb would certainly be much >> closer to what I'd like to see from the regulatory enforcement view >> point" >> >> I also like the fact that the help text mentions the relevant >> regulatory documents. I guess the users would appreciate that. >> > > Fair enough, but I'm not really convinced that the Kconfig option is > needed for what Jouni really required. > > In any case, I spoke with him yesterday and we don't think that your > patches are going to work as is - we'll need to change the regulatory > flags it seems. I'll comment more specifically on the patches.
OK. I'll wait for that. -Michal _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
