On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 20:48 +0700, Ivan Safonov wrote:
> ((thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == X)) and (thermometer == X) are equal 
> for X >= 0.

X is not guaranteed to be >= 0 here

> Signed-off-by: Ivan Safonov <insafo...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
[]
> @@ -4097,16 +4097,16 @@ static void ar9003_hw_thermometer_apply(struct ath_hw 
> *ah)
>               REG_RMW_FIELD(ah, AR_PHY_65NM_CH2_RXTX4,
>                             AR_PHY_65NM_CH0_RXTX4_THERM_ON_OVR, therm_on);
>  
> -     therm_on = (thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == 0);
> +     therm_on = thermometer == 0;

This code is not equivalent.

Check what happens when thermometer is -1.

>       REG_RMW_FIELD(ah, AR_PHY_65NM_CH0_RXTX4,
>                     AR_PHY_65NM_CH0_RXTX4_THERM_ON, therm_on);
>       if (pCap->chip_chainmask & BIT(1)) {
> -             therm_on = (thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == 1);
> +             therm_on = thermometer == 1;
>               REG_RMW_FIELD(ah, AR_PHY_65NM_CH1_RXTX4,
>                             AR_PHY_65NM_CH0_RXTX4_THERM_ON, therm_on);
>       }
>       if (pCap->chip_chainmask & BIT(2)) {
> -             therm_on = (thermometer < 0) ? 0 : (thermometer == 2);
> +             therm_on = thermometer == 2;
>               REG_RMW_FIELD(ah, AR_PHY_65NM_CH2_RXTX4,
>                             AR_PHY_65NM_CH0_RXTX4_THERM_ON, therm_on);
>       }

_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Reply via email to