There's no need to keep the same for loop twice in the code.
Move the txpower cap before the loop to reduce code complexity.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.sc...@googlemail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_phy.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_phy.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_phy.c
index 2f15cbc..81ab3ca 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_phy.c
@@ -1844,13 +1844,9 @@ static void ar9003_hw_tx99_set_txpower(struct ath_hw
*ah, u8 txpower)
static u8 p_pwr_array[ar9300RateSize] = { 0 };
unsigned int i;
- if (txpower <= MAX_RATE_POWER) {
- for (i = 0; i < ar9300RateSize; i++)
- p_pwr_array[i] = txpower;
- } else {
- for (i = 0; i < ar9300RateSize; i++)
- p_pwr_array[i] = MAX_RATE_POWER;
- }
+ txpower = txpower <= MAX_RATE_POWER ? txpower : MAX_RATE_POWER;
+ for (i = 0; i < ar9300RateSize; i++)
+ p_pwr_array[i] = txpower;
ar9003_hw_tx_power_regwrite(ah, p_pwr_array);
}
--
2.8.1
_______________________________________________
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
