I said to wrap it up Dewey, and that’s what I meant.

One more post from you on this thread and you’ll be banned from the list.

______________________________________________________________________

Denny Huff - President

Missouri Council of the Blind

 

P: (636) 262-1383

TF: (888) 362-1383

F: (314) 558-0298

 

dh...@moblind.org

www.moblind.org

 

ENCOURAGEMENT FOR THE JOURNEY

Your host: Denny Huff

Listen live,

SUNDAY MORNINGS AT 8:00 AM CST

WWW.KLPW.COM

 

 

From: ati-boun...@moblind.org [mailto:ati-boun...@moblind.org] On Behalf Of 
Dewey Bradley
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:14 AM
To: Adaptive technology information and support.
Subject: Re: [ATI] Stop internet censorship

 

I said most, not all, and you are wrong, there are more blind librals.

Ask other blind people

check your facts

Ask other blind people who they voted for

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Reginald George <mailto:ad...@kc.rr.com>  

To: Adaptive technology information and support. <mailto:ati@moblind.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:51 PM

Subject: Re: [ATI] Stop internet censorship

 

That is such a generalization and a stereotype.  How dare you label me, or 
anyone else here.  I would venture that there are more blind republicans than 
democrats.  Our views reflect that of the general population.  We are people 
first and blind second.  Blind has nothing to do with it.  That’s like saying 
all retirees are liberal because they draw social security and don’t want to 
lose their entitlements.  Well they worked for those benefits, and even though 
that program was started by a liberal, it’s been the only safety net that’s 
lasted.  The conservatives are so paranoid that they say if you claim you are 
an independent that it automatically means you are a liberal.  You think you 
are the only one who does their homework and knows the facts?  Well the fact is 
that reasonable intelligent people can look at the same  set of data and 
disagree on the correct way to utilize it.   And this list is no place for such 
a debate.  So far we’ve been able to just pass on information that may effect 
our use of technology without having to politicize it.  With respect I would 
say that this list is no place for politics except as it effects our ability to 
use the technology.  But I am personally offended that you feel you can cast 
aspersions on all blind people and put their views in such a negative light 
with so little to back it up.  

 

From: Dewey Bradley <mailto:dewey.brad...@kc.rr.com>  

Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:37 PM

To: Adaptive technology information and support. <mailto:ati@moblind.org>  

Subject: Re: [ATI] Stop internet censorship

 

I'm not going to argue with you, I know the facts, not everyone checks the 
facts, they just cuss and cry when someone disagrees with them, so I'm not even 
going to waste my time

So play all the cards you want, I don't care, most blind people are flaming 
librals who are anti business, and pro give give me, nine nine

So go ahead and cuss and yell at me, I am use to it.

You bitch about laws, but you want to put them on businesses, but think its 
fine for people to do what ever they want, even if it harms someone else, but 
just not companies.

I just think you are funny.

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Reginald George <mailto:ad...@kc.rr.com>  

To: Adaptive technology information and support. <mailto:ati@moblind.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:27 PM

Subject: Re: [ATI] Stop internet censorship

 

    So Dewey, let me get this straight.  You are for these bills because you 
want the government to put even more onerous regulation on the internet?  Now 
how the hell does that help your free market?  Who’s going to pay for the 
enforcement of all these new laws?  Is it only okay for the government to come 
in and regulate all these things when it benefits the big intellectual property 
monopolists and not the little guy   Is it fair for our ISPs to snoop on our 
hard drives and violate our privacy just so a small group of people can make 
more money?  I would contend that it is not.  If you dam up information it has 
to leak out somewhere.  

 

 

 

 

From: Dewey Bradley <mailto:dewey.brad...@kc.rr.com>  

Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:02 PM

To: Nancy Lynn <mailto:freespi...@accessibleworld.org>  ; Adaptive technology 
information and support. <mailto:ati@moblind.org>  

Subject: Re: [ATI] Stop internet censorship

 

This has 2 sides too it, some people take all the bandwith, the government 
needs to stay out of the free market, for example, they interfered with the 
AT&T T-mobile deel, T-mobile is for sale, and AT&T has the cash, and needs it 
to meet the needs of its customers, but everyone's beloved king Obama is 
against the free market, the very thing that made this country what it used to 
be.

People go on websights and download porn and watch movies, mean while 
businesses can't run, because they can't get on line, because people are useing 
all the bandwith, that is why they are putting caps on the data.

If you had a business, how would you feel if the government came in and told 
you how to run it, would you like it?

of course not.

That is European style socialism, but I don't expect most blind people to 
understand that, because that is what they want.

I needed to call 911 on my cell phone one time, but it said "network busy"

Because you have kids playing on the dam internet and blocking everyone else.

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Nancy Lynn <mailto:freespi...@accessibleworld.org>  

To: ACB List <mailto:ac...@acb.org>  ; Adaptive technology information and 
support. <mailto:ati@moblind.org>  ; CCB List <mailto:cc...@ccbnet.org>  ; Chat 
Moblind <mailto:c...@moblind.org>  ; Missouri List 
<mailto:missour...@moblind.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:25 PM

Subject: [ATI] Stop internet censorship

 

Dear Friend,

The Senate is poised to vote on a bill that would end the internet as we know 
it. 

If it passes, the "Protect IP Act" (and its companion bill in the House, 
"SOPA") could put people in jail for uploading a video to YouTube and would 
severely limit our right to free speech. 

This bill has been rushed through Congress because big corporate interests like 
Comcast, Pfizer, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have spent millions of 
dollars lobbying for this censoring legislation. 

I told my senators to protect our free and open internet and oppose the Protect 
IP Act. You should do the same. You can sign the petition at the link below.

 
<http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/internet_censorship/?r_by=-4976661-QS%3D3r5x&rc=paste1>
 
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/internet_censorship/?r_by=-4976661-QS%3D3r5x&rc=paste1
 


  _____  


_______________________________________________
ATI (Adaptive Technology Inc.)
A special interest affiliate of the Missouri Council of the Blind
http://moblind.org/membership/affiliates/adaptive_technology


  _____  


_______________________________________________
ATI (Adaptive Technology Inc.)
A special interest affiliate of the Missouri Council of the Blind
http://moblind.org/membership/affiliates/adaptive_technology


  _____  


_______________________________________________
ATI (Adaptive Technology Inc.)
A special interest affiliate of the Missouri Council of the Blind
http://moblind.org/membership/affiliates/adaptive_technology


  _____  


_______________________________________________
ATI (Adaptive Technology Inc.)
A special interest affiliate of the Missouri Council of the Blind
http://moblind.org/membership/affiliates/adaptive_technology

  _____  

_______________________________________________
ATI (Adaptive Technology Inc.)
A special interest affiliate of the Missouri Council of the Blind
http://moblind.org/membership/affiliates/adaptive_technology

_______________________________________________
ATI (Adaptive Technology Inc.)
A special interest affiliate of the Missouri Council of the Blind
http://moblind.org/membership/affiliates/adaptive_technology

Reply via email to