Tim Bray wrote:
<co-chair-mode>
1. Do nothing. The APP is limited to talking about how you traverse, add entries to, and delete from, collections, saying nothing about how you find them.


+1. Would like to see an evolution of the current workspace model defined in a separate I-D.

2. draft-protocol-06 approach: see http://bitworking.org/projects/ atom/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-06.html#appdocs - a custom XML vocabulary that describes collections and their capabilities.


-1. See above.

3. PaceAppOutline - another custom XML vocabulary which supports arbitrary nesting of collections, for which there are a couple of plausible use cases. See http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/ PaceUseAppOutlines

-1. The fact that the definition is separated out to a separate draft is good, but I'm not convinced on the format and don't like the idea of a normative reference to APPO.

- James

Reply via email to