On 11/6/05, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Should we use URI templates? (the current draft only has {index},
> and it seems unlikely that we could get consensus on anything more
> ambitious).-1. The default, core behavior should be an unadorned URI. Guessing how many entries are needed is *useless* in syncing scenarios. > 2. Should we have prev/next pointers in collections to allow clients > to page through? +0. Not harmful if optional. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
