+1... but only if there is not an in scope xml:base. For instance, the
following should be considered perfectly acceptable:
<entry>
...
<content xml:base="http://example.org/foo"; type="xhtml">
<div xmlns="..."><a href="bar">Link to bar</a></div>
</content>
</entry>
Joe Gregorio wrote:
On 1/29/06, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Plausible, but suppose the collection URI is edit.blogs.example.com/
collection and the thing you post ends up at read.blogs.example.com/
2006/01/29/312517391 ? The more I think about it, the more I think
that relative URIs in a POSTed body are almost certainly a symptom of
a bug, and there's a case for saying so in the spec. -Tim
+1
-joe
--
Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
