Thanks Kyle. That's good to know.
I suspect this won't be the last time this happens though. That's why I
added support for both of them in the first place. I think we kind of
screwed up in registering "previous" when there was already an existing
usage of "prev". That was bound to cause confusion. It's easy enough for
clients to support both, though, so I don't think it's such a big deal.
Regards
James
Kyle Marvin wrote:
The goal is for the Google GData API is to be fully aligned with
AtomPub, so it's usage of "prev" (an unregistered link relation)
instead of "previous" is a bug. We'll work to get that fixed.
In the interim, James' suggestion to check both is a reasonable
(temporary) workaround.
On 4/24/06, James Holderness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fantastic. I guess that was bound to happen. Good thing I included
support
for both of them.
