Ok, so this time it's actually done. Per an offlist suggestion (plea? ;-) ..) from Thomas, rather than cut-and-paste the full text of the pace here, I'll just provide a link to the pace which includes a summary of changes relative to PaceMediaEntries ;-)
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMediaEntries2 - James James M Snell wrote: > Ok, the first round of discussions around PaceMediaEntries was very > good. It's obvious given the various implementations out there and the > disagreements in that thread that more work is needed. Here's a second > attempt that incorporates some of the feedback from that discussion: > > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMediaEntries2 > > - James >
