On 5/9/06, Thomas Broyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I mean, why would the URI of the resource change?
I know :-) I have the same question. Anyway, you are right. Don't need no Location header.
> plus, > "Since a client already know the atom:id, etc, the > server MAY return the body. But it SHOULD return > if any of associated mediea resource or edit or > edit-resource uri has been changed." As I'm -1 on the SHOULD for the response body of 201 (Created) responses, I'm also -1 on this one.
OK, count me as +0.5 on this thing since I only have a limited experience on http/webarch.
so clients won't have to issue a subsequent GET, but that's an optimization trick (both on the client and server ends)
Then, I think it is a good idea to state "the best practice is to return an Atom Entry" some where. that's all. You know, if they don't have to do something, they just don't.
and has *nothing* to do with interop:
I never said it did. no one did. I was just <hopelessly wish>ing [1] . [1] http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg05024.html cheers -Toru
