On 18/5/06 2:02 PM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Yes, this makes sense. Also, I am changing this definition making ref >>> required in all cases. >> >> what if the other resource doesn't have an ID thingy ... what goes into the >> @ref then? >> > > If the other resource cannot be uniquely and persistently identified, > then it cannot be responded to. I think that's a fair trade off. :-( -1
