Joe Gregorio wrote:
On 6/6/06, Michael Wechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I guess one could consider the introspection document as
a published API. From the most recent draft (0.8) it is not clear to me
if an introspection document has a version (7.1 Example) or how else
will backwards/forwards compatibility handled in the case of the
introspection?
Do we need verbage like that of Section 6.2 in the Format spec?
Along with whatever the syntax wg have learned since that shipped, if
anything - ie there was an argument about attribute placement for feed
thread, I don't know if anything in terms of guidance came out of that.
cheers
Bill
