Re: Meaning of PUT

[Bill de hÓra]

Tim Bray wrote:

On Jun 14, 2006, at 8:36 PM, James M Snell wrote:

  Adding a constraint that we must reject entries that contain
stuff we can't store

Sorry... has *anyone* expressed support for adding such a constraint?  
Kyle explained that that's what they do, and people seem to think that 
it's OK, but nobody, as far as I know, wants to make it compulsory.  -Tim

The constraint might be a reasonable interpretation of PUT. Plus we have 
PacePreserveForeignMarkup.

cheers
Bill