The current Link Extensions[1] draft says "No IANA actions are required..." however, IANA maintains a registry of link-relations[2] that contains many of the link relations defined previously for use with Atom. Why wouldn't IANA be asked to include these new link relations in the existing registry?
Also, there is a Wiki for HTML5 Link Relations[3] -- some of which come from Atom. Is there any reason it wouldn't be appropriate to include these new link relations in the HTML5 list? bob wyman [1] http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-atompub-link-extensions-05.txt [2] http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml [3] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions
