Changes made. will hold off posting draft -10 until I'm sure there are no further quick changes.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote: > Great. LGTM -- assuming those changes. > bob wyman > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, James Snell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> [snip] >> >> I disagree. There may be no source feed at all... and therefore no >> >> reason for atom:source >> > >> > >> > You are, of course, correct. How about saying that "if there is a source >> > feed, you MUST provide an atom:source" ??? >> > >> >> >> >> That works for me. > > -- - James Snell http://www.snellspace.com [email protected]
