Hey Alistair, On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Alistair Miles <[email protected]> wrote: > Generally speaking, we've found this to be a very useful feature in several > applications, and would be interested in revisiting James' original I-D if > anyone else was. > > I think the draft would need updating to deal with a couple of relatively > minor issues we've worked around, and the fact that the new tombstones draft > [3] overlaps (see [4]). But for the most part, it works well as-is, for us > at least.
I would definitely be interested in a revision to Atom Syndication Format Revision Tracking [1] to work better with Atom Tombstones [2], and also Link Relation Types for Simple Version Navigation between Web Resources (RFC 5829) [3]. I'd be curious to hear how you are using the extension in the work you are doing, if you had a blog post in you, or if it could be posted here. Being able to express version relations on the web is very important for digital library applications. //Ed [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-revision-00 [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones [3] http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc5829
