Tuesday, August 16, 2005, 11:14:42 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> E.g., what if I want to have an optional attribute on an empty > element? Is it "simple" or "complex"? FYI: The first draft of the proposal used an atom:notation="structured" attribute on the extension to indicate the extension class which avoided that problem, but I think it was considered to be too crufty. -- Dave
