James M Snell wrote: > As I've been going through the effort of defining a number of Atom > extensions, I've consistently come back to the thought that it would be > interesting to explore the creation of a "Common Extensions Namespace" > under which multiple standardized extensions can be grouped. I've > written an initial draft of the concept but before I submit it as an > Internet Draft, I'd like to get some feedback from the group. Please > review the attached and let me know what you think.
I don't get it. Why centralize names like this? cheers Bill
