On 10/14/05, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I believe "the language of the resource" for hreflang makes no sense - > >it will be the *representations* that are associated with languages, > > I think that's being way too picky. It makes sense that content (the > generic term) might have a language associated with it.
What's the R in URI stand for? :) > >and "the" implies a single language - there may be more than one. > > That's true. And it matches the XML 1.0 spec exactly. I don't understand the second issue being raised here. Could someone try again? Robert Sayre
