A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-14 23:00]:
If any additional wording is necessary, then it should be
explicit that it only relates to the media type of
'application/atom+xml'. It is, in my opinion, redundant to say
this because ID reference for a application/atom+xml document
is the Atom Entry ID. Other media types would use their own
forms of identifiers.
Well yes, you’re right. But I’d really want to see at least
*some* explicit mention of using Atom IDs as idrefs somewhere in
the spec. However redundant it may seem, I’d feel more
comfortable if it wasn’t merely implied.
+1. I'll make that change
This clearly is an interoperability issue.
+1
- James
