On 10/18/05, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Requiring a separate element to always be present is a non-starter; > what is the point of a "reusable" link relation if you have to use it > with another element to contextualise it? I'm really stretching to > see any benefit from this approach. > > prev-archive (or maybe prev-entries?) is starting to look better, as > is <fh:prev/>.
Hogwash. Do not reinvent the AtomAPI. Posting on atom-syntax and then claiming your way is the right way after all because people are arguing and some folks are saying silly things... why did you bother? Robert Sayre
