> >Second, although less important - even applications which do support > >rel="subscribe" will have to implement a fallback behaviour. > Arguably, > >they already do in some fashion, because a feed may omit the > rel="self" > >link, so I don't know if this is such a pressing issue. > > > >For these two (similar) reasons I think it might be wise to keep > >rel="self" in the role that this new rel="subscribe" thing > is supposed > >to fulfill, and invent a new relationship that can point to the > >canonical location of the archive feed document. > > > > > > > -1. self always points to *this* document and is only usable > for subscribing to *this* document. You cannot use it to > point to a separate document.
I agree with James. I like to think of it like this: * = current page/document/feed in a 9 page archive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |----|----|----|----*----|----|----|----| ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ rel=subscribe | | rel=next rel=last Rel=first | rel=self | "current page" rel=prev You should subscribe to the HEAD of the feed (assuming there are multiple pages to the feed. Self is analogous to "this" and should be /purely/ (excuse the circular definition) self referencial.