+1, As an alternative, Feed Readers can provide publishers with a way of
specifying optionally applied styling for feeds and entries.. e.g.,
<feed>
...
<link rel="stylesheet" type="..." href="..." />
...
<entry>
...
<link rel="stylesheet" type="..." href="..." />
...
</entry>
</feed>
- James
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>[snip]
>> I argue that the right thing for a publisher is to serve HTML
>> when they want control over the look and feel of the entire set
>> of content, and to serve RSS/Atom when they want their data
>> consumed as a feed (which has always meant surrendering the
>> look-and-feel to the particular client the user chooses).
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
