Elliotte Harold wrote:
John Panzer wrote:
All -- I'm starting a discussion about feed licencing which might be
of interest to members of this mailing list, and which will hopefully
help form the technical extensions that AOL uses to deal with feed
licencing. I'd welcome any input that this group may have. Directly
relevant to this list, I'm tentatively advocating adopting James
Snell's RelLicense extension for Atom, and looking for equivalent
mechanisms for RSS.
Link:
http://journals.aol.com/panzerjohn/abstractioneer/entries/1281
Thank you! This is a very important discussion. I'm very glad to see
AOL thinking about this. I'd love to comment on it. (Yes there are a
few things you're missing to answer one of your questions.)
But perhaps such an important discussion should happen somewhere that
doesn't require annoying registration and pages of AOL legalese just
to comment? As is I'll probably just put my comments up on my own blog
and link to it from there.
I think that's fine and appropriate, personally. I've also tagged my
post with Feed+Copyright and perhaps we can use that globally to help
ensure posts get caught:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Feed+Copyright"; rel="tag">Feed
Copyright</a>
the tag page already yields relevant posts at Technorati.
--
John Panzer
System Architect, AOL
http://abstractioneer.org
