Did you find that algorithm wrong, too hard to understand/implement, or did you just do a different take on it? Does the approach that you took end up having the same result?

Any suggestions on how to better document it appreciated.

Cheers,


On 2006/04/26, at 8:35 PM, James Holderness wrote:


We added support for next/prev/previous links in version 0.3.0 of Snarfer [1]. We don't use the reconstruction algorithm suggested in the Feed History draft, but your example feed seems to work ok for an initial retrieval. There may be problems with subsequent updates, though, depending on how you handle items falling out the bottom of the main feed.

Regards
James

[1] http://www.snarfware.com/

John Panzer wrote:
We just deployed support for [EMAIL PROTECTED]"previous" et al. for
AOL Journals.  If anyone has a client that makes use of these
links, please let me know, I'd love to see if there are any
interoperability problems.




--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Reply via email to