James Holderness wrote: >[snip] > Yeah, I noticed that when I was testing our image content support. Most > feed readers (I tested about a dozen or so) either showed the raw base64 > or nothing at all. One couldn't parse my test feed at all when it > contained base64-encoded content. Why am I not surprised? >
I don't have access to a Windows box right now... how does snarfer do on these tests? > Btw, were your tests meant to be using a media type of "applcation/xml" > (note the missing 'i')? > Oops. Fixed. - James
