Hello Nicolas, thanks for the comments.
Nicolas Krebs wrote: >[snip] > In section 3, this draft give an xml element corresponding to In-reply-to: > (rfc 2822 section 3.6.4). Therefore, the draft do not give an equivalent to > References: 822' header field (rfc 2822 section 3.6.4) (wich could be usefull > to build a mail --> atom gateway). > A feed thread element in the form of <thr:in-reply-to ref="..." /> Would serve as the equivalent to the RFC2822 in-reply-to header. And yes, it would likely be good to mention that the in-reply-to element draws some of its inspiration from the smtp in-reply-to header. - James
