All I need to know is who to transfer it to. - James
Martin Duerst wrote: > At 10:43 06/07/10, Robert Sayre wrote: > >> Hi Lisa, >> >> Thanks for the clarification. You may have missed another question I >> recently asked, so I'll repeat it here. I am concerned that purl.org >> lists the document author as the owner of the namespace URI, and I >> wonder how the IESG came to the conclusion that the namespace is not a >> problem. I see Sam Hartman raised the issue. What was the resolution? >> Could the draft advance to Draft- or Full-Standard in that namespace? > > I looked at that namespace shortly. It seems that it would be easy > to change the owners to make clear that this is owned by the IETF. > This can be done whenever it's needed. A purl namespace in and > by itself isn't any better or worse than a W3C namespace. > > Regards, Martin. > > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
