On 2006-09-05 22:02:59 -0700, John Panzer wrote: > Here's my rationale: Atom has explicit support in the core RFC > 4287 syntax for 'synthetic' feeds containing entries from > multiple sources produced by multiple authors with different > copyrights. RSS 2.0 doesn't have this core support. So in the > case of Atom, the issue is a bit more urgent. So tackling the > Atom case first makes sense to me.
This is an important use case for having per-item license links. I do not see, however, how this is a reason against having per-feed default licenses, consistent with atom:rights. Note, in particular, that an aggregating party may very well be in a position to make licensing assertions about all the entries in a feed. -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
