Le 12 sept. 06 à 08:39, Jan Algermissen a écrit :
Umm...am I missing something? Is it that bad?
What I am basically aiming at is a common means to relate entries
to each other to indicate one is a version of the other or to link
from an entry to a feed that consists of versions of that entry,
If I am not completely wrong, versioning is definitely an issue if
you want to employ Atom in beyond-blogging contexts. Most people
that deal with collections of items are definitely interested in
keeping track of the former versions of the items.
Are you talking about threading?
Why not putting it outside of Atom and use the power of links for
threading.
Similar discussion but for comments happened on microformats ML.
So IMHO, it is slightly off-topic, in the sense you could achieve it
by an application built on top of Atom without touching Atom
AND Tim Bray could come back in the room :p
From the microformats ML
Le 12 sept. 06 à 08:35, Karl Dubost a écrit :
Hi Steph,
Le 12 sept. 06 à 07:17, Stephanie Booth (bunny) a écrit :
A while back somebody showed me a blog marked up with hatom. That
person used hatom on the comments too (on the single post page) --
that meant two hfeeds: one containing only the post, and another one
with the comments.
Does this way of using hatom on comments make sense to you? I noticed
that neither K2 nor Sandbox wordpress themes do this.
Completely logical.
Each individual comment is nothing more than a weblog post.
The only technical difference is that it is not made on another
weblog, but directly on the weblog of the person.
Each individual comment is structured like a weblog post.
It has (required)
- an id, the URI of the comment
- a title, often the same than the original weblog post, sometimes
a different (see SPIP)
- a date when it has been done (updated)
It has (recommended)
- often an author
- content (core text of the comment)
- link (the URI of the Weblog original post we are commenting on)
It just miss a summary, but that is not mandatory in Atom either.
IMHO, it should be an individual hatom entry for each comment, The
way everything is aggregated and organized has a full feed is
another debate. The date and link should help to create a pseudo
thread.
It could be a full thread like in SPIP when the commenter has the
possibility to reply to a specific comment in this case the link
becomes the URI of the specific comment.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
