That's certainly a strong option. - James
James Holderness wrote: > > If you're going to require a separate namespace for bidi support, maybe > it's best to use XHTML 1.0 and just toss out the lro and rlo values. I > know I was originally pushing for those to be included, but now that > I've seen how inconsistent the bdo support is in browsers I think > they're probably going to be a waste of time. Nobody is going to get > them right. > > Regards > James > >