That "bucket" already exists in the form of the app:control element.
<entry> ... <x:foo /> ... <app:control> ... <x:bar /> ... </app:control> </entry> - James Eric Scheid wrote: > [snip] > We did at one time discuss providing a bucket container specifically for the > latter, with the assumption that extensions outside the bucket are data > elements meant for publication. Having a bucket container would make life > simpler for server implementations -- just store everything as an xml blob, > the same as they do for atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Lisa, would that help? > > e. > > >