James M Snell wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational
Move Autodiscovery forward as an Informational RFC
But if it were published as an informational RFC, what purpose would it
serve?
I intend to post a much more substantial review of the current draft
shortly, but for now, see my comments on the RSS Autodiscovery spec,
some of which will also apply to the Atom Autodiscovery spec.
http://www.rssboard.org/news/70/vote-rss-autodiscovery-specification#discuss
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
