Ok, so given that I think this is the fifth or sixth note in which you've said exactly the same thing, I think your position has been well established. What would be excellent is if you'd give others the opportunity to weigh in on it before trying so hard to filibuster it.
- James Robert Sayre wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> >> http://www.rssboard.org/news/70/vote-rss-autodiscovery-specification#discuss >> > > "Like the Atom Autodiscovery draft, this spec serves no purpose. > Autodiscovery is being defined in the HTML5 spec where it belongs, with > both the alternate > <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#alternate0> and feed > <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#feed0> relationships." > > Fully agree. > > -Rob > >
