----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Miller" <maxamill...@fedoraproject.org> > To: atomic-devel@projectatomic.io > Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:26:28 AM > Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] [PATCH] Re: Fedora atomic host 23 and ansible > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 04:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > >> Python 2 is explicitly installed, but the question is how far up the stack > >> we go. > > > > Specifically a topical question is `python-docker-py` which is used > > by the Ansible Docker module. > > > > Personally, I vote against adding this - anyone who wants to pull > > Docker containers can just use `command: docker pull` relatively > > easily, and in the big picture we want Kubernetes to handle things like > > this. > > Open to discussion though. > > > > I'd vote in favor of including the python-docker-py package for users > of Atomic Host and the Ansbile docker module. There have been more > than one instance I've been involved in where someone in IRC is > reporting that "Ansible doesn't work on Atomic Host" because they were > trying to use the docker module and their understanding was the docker > was "the way" to do things in Atomic. While kubernetes is great, I'd > prefer to offer the userbase more freedom to choose how they deploy > and manage docker containers on an Atomic Host and Ansbile seems to be > quite popular among the Atomic Host userbase (just in general, not > specifically for docker deployments) so I don't think it's an > unrealistic expectation that the Ansible docker module works out of > the box.
+1 I'd rather err on the side of satisfying user expectations Jason > > Just my opinion though, I'd be curious of others opinions on the topic as > well. > > -AdamM > >