----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Micene" <nzwul...@gmail.com> > To: "Jonathan Lebon" <jle...@redhat.com> > Cc: "atomic-devel" <atomic-devel@projectatomic.io>, "container-tools" > <container-to...@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 12:48:59 PM > Subject: Re: [atomic-devel] Landing pages > > The current swing at a Vagrant based doc is here: > > https://github.com/nzwulfin/atomic-site/blob/vagrant/source/docs/vagrant_installation.md > > Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're > > familiar with Vagrant or not?
The manageiq website handles this sort of branching pretty nicely: http://manageiq.org/download/ You choose openstack, ovirt, rhev or vsphere, and each heads off to a nice short quickstart. Jason > > > That's also another topic that came in the original discussion is how many > X Guides at all levels to we need? Virtualbox vs Libvirt? Vagrant vs Adv > Vagrant? Fedora vs Centos? > > Here's the discussion that happened on IRC a billion Internet years ago: > > https://gist.github.com/nzwulfin/022dc7438a8f43a999df > > > Open to comments and questions > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Lebon <jle...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > I agree and am claiming responsibility here. We have an arguably better > > > experience available currently for Fedora Atomic via Vagrant. > > > > This is something that I've been trying to address with > > Developer Mode as well, although I can see both of them > > serving their purpose. E.g. Vagrant is much nicer if folks > > are already set up for it, while Developer Mode is nice for > > first timers who don't want that upfront investment of > > setting up and learning Vagrant just to try out Atomic. > > > > > So, excuses aside, I'll put together a new Super Quick Start Guide > > > highlighting the vagrant builds that Dusty and Jason have worked hard on > > > putting together. > > > > Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're > > familiar with Vagrant or not? Or would that be too confusing > > to present? > > >
