On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 04:22 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:

> 

> 

> On Dec 6, 2016 17:22, "Josh Berkus" <jber...@redhat.com> wrote:

>> Folks,

>> 

>>  Given all of the changes in the platform, it's time to rewrite and

>>  re-organize the Atomic Host documentation.  Here's what I'm
>>  thinking for
>>  structure:

>> 

>> 

>>  * Introduction

>>  * Installation

>>          * Vagrant

>>          * Public Cloud

>>          * ISO

>>          * Others

>>  * Quick Start

>>          * Links to simplest setups, below

>>  * Cluster Setup

>>          * Single-Node Vagrant Example (QS)

>>          * AH + Kubernetes

>>                  * Kubeadm (QS)

>>                  * Kubernetes-Ansible (production)

>>          * OpenShift

>>                  * oc cluster up (QS)

>>                  * Openshift-Ansible (production)

>>          * Other Platforms

>>                  * Swarm?

>>                  * Mesos?

>>  * Using Ostree

>>          * Updates

>>          * Rebasing

>>          * Hotfixes & Testing

>>          * Overlays

>>  * Atomic Tools

>>          * Atomic CLI (link, maybe)

>>          * Docker (and Docker Latest)

>>          * System Containers

>>          * Other stuff?

>> 

>>  Open Questions:

>> 

>>  1) Should these be combined Fedora/CentOS docs, or should we make a
>>  "build" for each OS?

> 

> I think they should work for both, be hosted from projectatomic or
> rtd, and then excerpted or linked to as desired by Fedora and CentOS.


I believe we should host them where it makes the most sense for Project
Atomic.  I am partial to projectatomic.io, but can easily see using RTD
as a temporary stop-gap.


I hope the platform we are building in Fedora will be able to consume
the source files for rebranding and publishing as is appropriate to
Fedora (+RHEL +CentOS).  Once finished (heh) that platform would allow
for easy hosting at projectatomic.io as well.


regards,



bex



>> 

>> 2) Where should these live? projectatomic.io or RTD?

>> 

>>  3) Is Vagrant really where we want to direct people as a quickstart
>>  option?  I'm asking because I'm not that clear on what users
>>  can *do*
>>  with an single atomic node on vagrant.

> 

> A single node can get you a taste of docker or origin or kube, esp if
> you're on Windows or OS X. You could develop for a legit cluster using
> a single node vm.
>>
>>
>> --
>>  --
>>  Josh Berkus Project Atomic Red Hat OSAS

Reply via email to