Are the POSIX issues in applications running on overlay mostly resolved now? I.e. if we flipped the default would be reasonably able to support a diverse range of Linux workloads without the risk that previously existed?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 12/12/2016 05:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > > On 12/12/2016 02:24 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > >> I think the rationale is that we'd like to not have a much different > >> experience whether you are using docker on atomic host or not. My > >> thoughts are that overlay is where we want to be in the future and > >> Fedora is the first place we should try that out. > >> > >> DM would still be supported via configuration of docker-storage-setup, > >> just like overlay is supported today in the same way. > > I'd the impression from the Docker hackers that overlayfs was their > > future platform. > > > Docker is moving to a default of Overlay2, I think we should follow this > lead. > >
