There's a lot to like about ignition. We could adopted it, but we couldn't dump cloud-init for the sheer number of users and providers that rely on it.
>From my side, I haven't received any requests for ignition. I'd be interested if anyone else has. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 05:09:19PM +0000, Matt Micene wrote: > > > So..... is it time to revisit replacing cloud-init with something else? > > > Maybe the CoreOS implementation? > > Are you talking about Ignition? https://coreos.com/ignition/ > docs/latest/ > > They've moved much earlier into the startup process (operating in > > initramfs) which would be a major step for Atomic. > > Maybe also that. But CoreOS does a two-stage thing, with ignition for > the early setup and then their own implementation of cloud-init later > -- this only implements a subset of the cloud-config functionality, > which, honestly, I think is for the best. > > -- > Matthew Miller [email protected] < > http://mattdm.org/> > Fedora Project Leader [email protected] < > http://fedoraproject.org/> > > -- Ben Breard Sr Technology Product Manager - Linux Containers Mobile: 972-816-9081
