Remind me again... Why does atrpms continue to package lirc? Both the
user-space and kernel-space bits of lirc are already provided in Fedora.
I was prompted to ask this, because I"ve built and pushed lirc 0.8.3
final into fedora 8 and 9, but noted that this winds up being
rpm-*older* than the atrpms' ~2mo old pre-0.8.3 cvs snapshot... In my
eyes, there's really no justification for atrpms to continue shipping
lirc.



-- 
Jarod Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel

Reply via email to