Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:14 PM, John Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:25:26AM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: >> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics177.67-177.67-101.fc8.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics177.67-177.67-101.fc8.src.rpm> >>> Thanks, it's in the repo now! >> I just wanted to point out that nVidia has released yet another update >> for the latest beta driver (177.76). This represents the third such >> update to the latest beta that started with the 177.67 release. I'm >> not sure why nVidia isn't updating their website to reflect these >> releases, but my understanding from following some of the nVidia >> forums is that each release has fixed bugs, some of which seem pretty >> severe, that were introduced in the 177.67 driver. >> >> Details of this latest driver can be found here: >> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=119682 >> >> > These beta versions are multiplying like rabbits. > I am using the version 177.67 with the GeForce 8 series, > with no problem so far, mainly because of cuda 2.0. > > The bugs fixed seem to be mostly for older series 6 and 7 > (no cuda capability anyway). > > What are you exactly looking for? Any special bug to be fixed? > Why don't we wait a bit longer to see if they stabilize a bit > and then you send an email reminding me to repack it?
Hi Paulo. From where I'm reading it seems that .67 is the worst of the beta ones and that the others are plainly better. So I don't see the point not to package the latest one at least, especially due to some of the bad bugs being crushed in anything >.67. // Stefan _______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
