On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth wrote: > On 12/21/2008 02:38 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 03:25:58PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > >>> I've uploaded openafs-1.4.8-30.fc10.src.rpm to > >>> [email protected]:openafs/. > > > > This one fails with > > > > cc -fPIC -O -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8/src/config -I. -I. > > -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8/include -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8/include/afs > > -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8/include/rx -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8 > > -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8/src -I/builddir/openafs-1.4.8/src -g -O2 > > -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -c rxstat.c > > rxstat.c:47: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before > > 'rpcStats' > > rxstat.c: In function 'MRXSTATS_RetrieveProcessRPCStats': > > rxstat.c:54: error: 'stats' undeclared (first use in this function) > > Looks like rxgen doesn't generate rxstat.h correctly. > See this post: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.openafs.devel/7173 > > Is PATH_CPP set correctly? > > $ grep ^PATH_CPP config.log > PATH_CPP='/usr/bin/cpp'
Yes, it is set correctly. > On which distro does it fail? F10/x86_64 and the worst thing is that is builds nicely on F10/i386, so it's a arch dependent bug :( One thing I noticed when comparing the logs is that while both do similar configuring for gcc the i386 uses gcc and x86_64 cc. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgp9CevNzstzd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
