Hi, On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:35:54PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Smietanowski > > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > >> > >>> Axel, > >>> > >>> I think you will not be able to compile alsa-driver for the new F10 > >>> kernel. > >>> > >>> Fedora defined fmode_t in the kernel, and it is conflicting with > >>> the definition in the alsa tarball.
Yes, thanks, I saw that is morning. :(
> >>> I do not see an elegant way to patch it, because the test in the tarball
> >>> if for kernels < 2.6.28. Furthermore, it was not supposed to appear
> >>> a new typedef in the 2.6.27 kernel.
Perhaps it's one of the backported patches from 2.6.28. There are at
least two, but I didn't look deeper into this - part of the next
kernels are quite often appearing in Fedora and more often in RHEL
kernels requiring quirks and patches.
> Here is the error. Some new symbols have just "appeared" in the kernel ...
>
> this is the location of the previous definition
> In file included from include/linux/sched.h:86,
> from include/linux/smp_lock.h:5,
> from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
> from include/linux/interrupt.h:11,
> from
> /builddir/build/BUILD/alsa-driver/drivers/pcsp/../../alsa-kernel/drivers/pcsp/pcsp_lib.c:11,
> from
> /builddir/build/BUILD/alsa-driver/drivers/pcsp/pcsp_lib.c:5:
> include/linux/hrtimer.h:249: error: expected identifier or '(' before
> 'const'
Are these new symbols comflicting with ones from alsa, too?
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgp4yVYwmYqPx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
