Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:54:57AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote: > I've been talking to someone in #centos and he has a problem upgrading > to the latest Asterisk 1.4 version :
> 1:asterisk14-1.4.26.1-85.el5.i386 from atrpms has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: libgsm.so.1 is needed by package > 1:asterisk14-1.4.26.1-85.el5.i386 (atrpms) > 1:asterisk14-1.4.26.1-85.el5.i386 from atrpms has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: libspeexdsp.so.1 is needed by package > 1:asterisk14-1.4.26.1-85.el5.i386 (atrpms) > Error: Missing Dependency: libspeexdsp.so.1 is needed by package > 1:asterisk14-1.4.26.1-85.el5.i386 (atrpms) > Error: Missing Dependency: libgsm.so.1 is needed by package > 1:asterisk14-1.4.26.1-85.el5.i386 (atrpms) > > I've did some checking. The gsm package is in bleeding. I guess > because it is a new package, so I presume it will end up in stable > sooner or later. Good catch, I'll promote it right away. > The speex issue is a bit different. It seems this version of > Asterisk is compiled against the speex 1.2 present in testing. I > have a feeling that 1.4 used to be compiled against the one in > available in the OS. But I'm not really sure. You are right. > I personally don't mind using the version in testing. But it could > mean that a lot of people currently using 1.4 (and probably 1.2) > will need to enable the testing repo. Same for 1.6 and 160. The new speex package is needed for Tuan Hoang's packages, and its presence just medled into the asterisk builds. Hm, I'm a bit undecided. I either rebuild all asterisk packages again to build against the vendor speex, or force RHEL/CentOS/SL users uinto using testing. I think I'll bite the bullet and go rebuilding - again :( -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpOVas350k1D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
