Paulo:

Sorry, I also meant to include a diff from the 304.51 spec file to the
310.19.  Nothing jumps out at me:

 diff nvidia-graphics304.51.spec nvidia-graphics310.19.spec
2,3c2,3
< Version: 304.51
< Release: 149%{?dist}
---
> Version: 310.19
> Release: 151%{?dist}
191c191
< mv %{buildroot}%{_x_libraries}/lib*.so*
%{buildroot}%{_x_libraries}/%{NVfolder}/
---
> #mv %{buildroot}%{_x_libraries}/lib*.so*
%{buildroot}%{_x_libraries}/%{NVfolder}/
193c193
< ln -s %{NVfolder}/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1
%{buildroot}%{_x_libraries}/libXvMCNVIDIA.so
---
> #ln -s %{NVfolder}/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1
%{buildroot}%{_x_libraries}/libXvMCNVIDIA.so
287c287
< %{_x_libraries}/%{NVfolder}/libXvMCNVIDIA*.so.*
---
> #%{_x_libraries}/%{NVfolder}/libXvMCNVIDIA*.so.*
306,308c306,308
< %{_x_libraries}/libXvMCNVIDIA.a
< %{_x_libraries}/libXvMCNVIDIA.so
< %{_x_libraries}/%{NVfolder}/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so
---
> #%{_x_libraries}/libXvMCNVIDIA.a
> #%{_x_libraries}/libXvMCNVIDIA.so
> #%{_x_libraries}/%{NVfolder}/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so
327c327,333
< * Sun Oct 21 2012 Axel Thimm Paulo Roma <r...@lcg.ufrj.br> - 304.51-149
---
> * Sat Dec 01 2012 Paulo Roma <r...@lcg.ufrj.br> - 310.19-151
> - Update to 310.19.
>
> * Fri Nov  9 2012 Axel Thimm <axel.th...@atrpms.net> - 304.64-150
> - Update to 304.64.
>
> * Sun Oct 21 2012 Paulo Roma Paulo Roma <r...@lcg.ufrj.br> - 304.51-149



On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:08 PM, George Galt <george.g...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Paulo:
>
> Oddly, prior iterations of the nvidia-graphics-libs didn't require
> libnvcuvid.so, even though they installed them.  I'm currently running the
> 304.51 driver, and rpm reports:
>
> rpm -q --requires -p nvidia-graphics304.51-libs-304.51-149.fc16.x86_64.rpm
> /bin/sh
> /bin/sh
> libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> libXext.so.6()(64bit)
> libXv.so.1()(64bit)
> libXvMC.so.1()(64bit)
> libc.so.6()(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libdl.so.2()(64bit)
> libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
> libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
> libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)(64bit)
> libm.so.6()(64bit)
> libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libnvidia-glcore.so.304.51()(64bit)
> libnvidia-tls.so.304.51()(64bit)
> libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> librt.so.1()(64bit)
> librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libvdpau.so.1()(64bit)
> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1()(64bit)
> libvdpau_trace.so.1()(64bit)
> libz.so.1()(64bit)
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
>
> and the driver also installed libnvcuvid.so as:
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-304.51/libnvcuvid.so.1
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-304.51/libnvcuvid.so.304.51
>
> As you can see, the new 310 driver, unlike the 304 driver, requires
> libnvcuvid:
> rpm -q --requires -p nvidia-graphics310.19-libs-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64.rpm
> /bin/sh
> /bin/sh
> libX11.so.6()(64bit)
> libXext.so.6()(64bit)
> libc.so.6()(64bit)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libdl.so.2()(64bit)
> libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
> libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
> libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)(64bit)
> libm.so.6()(64bit)
> libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libnvcuvid.so()(64bit)
> libnvidia-glcore.so.310.19()(64bit)
> libnvidia-tls.so.310.19()(64bit)
> libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
> libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> librt.so.1()(64bit)
> librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
> libvdpau.so.1()(64bit)
> libvdpau_nvidia.so.1()(64bit)
> libvdpau_trace.so.1()(64bit)
> libz.so.1()(64bit)
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
>
>
> But you can see that the package will install it:
> rpm -q --filesbypkg -p
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs-310.19-151.fc16.x86_64.rpm
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libGL.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libGL.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libOpenCL.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libOpenCL.so.1.0
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libcuda.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libcuda.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvcuvid.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvcuvid.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-cfg.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-cfg.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-compiler.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-encode.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-encode.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-glcore.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-ml.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-ml.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-opencl.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-opencl.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libnvidia-tls.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libvdpau.so
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libvdpau.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libvdpau.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libvdpau_nvidia.so
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/libvdpau_trace.so
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/tls
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/vdpau
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.310.19
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/vdpau/libvdpau_trace.so.1
> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs
> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-310.19/vdpau/libvdpau_trace.so.310.19
>
>
> Do you know where the "requires" variables are set?  I am assuming that it
> is something in the SPEC file.  We could simply take the route of prior
> drivers and eliminate libnvcuvid.so() from the list of requirements.  But
> it seems odd that it requires a file that it will install itself without
> being aware that it will deliver its own "requirement".
>
> In any event, it seems that installing this with --nodeps will be OK, but
> I would just prefer to fix the correct files so that others can comfortably
> do the install.
>
> George
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, George Galt <george.g...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <pro...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:13 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.uc...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> In each case, the path differs by the addition of
>>>>>> "nvidia-graphics-310.14" before the file being looked for.  Does anyone
>>>>>> have any idea how to either adjust the spec file or alter the way it 
>>>>>> looks
>>>>>> for these files?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> George
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> I have a fixed .src.rpm, here:
>>
>>
>> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-151.fc17.src.rpm
>>
>> In fact, the fix was easy, and I just had to comment a few lines in the
>> spec file.
>>
>> However, when installing, rpm keeps complaining about
>>
>> libnvcuvid.so()(64bit) is needed by
>> nvidia-graphics310.19-libs-310.19-151.fc17.x86_64
>>
>> I just used --nodeps and everything installs and runs fine.
>>
>> Maybe someone can take a look and figure what is going on...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
>> DCC - UFRJ
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel

Reply via email to